---++ Minutes: * 2-page abstract due for this year. We'll develop it in the directory: * DOC/abstract inside SVN. Dave will start it and email around [DM] * Qualification video - take it sometime that's convenient * Start planning itinerary * 12 possibly interested {TH, AG, MM, CG, PF, MB, SH, DM, PV, SM, WW, TS} * SH to email the 4 supervisors, who will figure it out for us :) {JL, DL, BW, AM} * For budgeting reasons, the costs are roughly: * >= $380 US round-trip for flights * ~ $55/night per room at the Monte Carlo (cheaper elsewhere) * ~ $2000 for robot shipping * Potentially some conference registrations ($400.00 for students) * Catherine update on shipping * Cost for shipping is about the same as cost to rent a car and drive * MM might be ok with driving his own car. Wonder how much UBC/SRVC would compensate him for putting 6K on his new Jetta * Debate on driving vs shipping on several axes: * Shipping: * Pros: Doesnt take our time, if we invest in a crate (~$800), we always have it later * Cons: Potential for damage, extra downtime for robot with packaging * Driving: * Pros: We keep the robot in our possession, saves cost on flights * Cons: Takes a lot of our time * Major issue seems to be how long the shipping downtime would be. CG to check out. * Also would like to know if it's possible to rent a truck with unlimited km. SH to check out. * Dont forget that loading the robot into anything without a ramp is difficult. * Need to decide soon. * Theakston and Lapinkulta are self-admined and can be used for development. Log in with lciuser... and sudo adduser to make your own account. * Finally, the list of completed and in progress tasks. ---++ Completed components: * Porting of basic drivers for: bumblebee, cannon and powerbot * Tower design * gmapping * Tilting laser drivers * Robot coordinate transform code * Network configuration and development environment * Robot router setup * Setup self-administered PC's * ROS instructions ---++Current in-progress task list: * Capture data from robot for testing * Basic robot functions based on ROS. (with aim to perform a preliminary test run of navigation and mapping) [MM and DM] * WG nav stack * Tower upgrade: * Order material for building a new laser/camera mount and assemble same. * Saliency maps and visual attention * Basic saliency map computation [DM] * Stereo + saliency combined to identify interesting regions [PV] * High-level control functionality such as planning * Random walk behavior * 3 main high-level planners: * Exploring frontiers * Find tables [PV] * Space coverage * Look back at objects * Top level state machine to choose between above planners * Choice of "where-to-look" aka attention system * Recognition framework (James module directly or something built upon that) [AG and CG] * Combining results from different types of detectors (different algorithms) * Combining results from various viewpoints * We'll meet on the previous two topics tomorrow * Collect data for 5 "given" object classes once they're published * Test data interface * Felzenswalb detector * MB profiled Kenji's python implementation - most of the time in convolution - promising * Will investigate cuda'ing pieces * Helmer detector * Using point cloud, * Mccann * Training data interface and additional parameters * Cuda on fraser [MB, WW and TH] * Need to get the code compiling * GPUSift * FastHOG * Web grabbing module [PF and CG] * Add additional sources of info * Investigate filtering techniques * Integrate output data format with classification * Speed-up of Felzenswalb training [MB] * Initial investigation to verify this is a doable task (profiling current code, ensuring good performance on web data, investigation of potential speedups such as GPU feature extraction and SVM learning) ---++ Future tasks pending completion of others: * Use of 3D models in recognition * Use of 3D information and context in attention system * Real time result reporting * Feeding back classification results to robot planner * Investigate new cameras which might be faster than the Cannon * Prioritizing computation done by classifiers towards images which look really promising to the attention system, and based on the classes which have already been recognized.
This topic: LCI
>
WebHome
>
TheSemanticRobotVisionChallenge
>
Oct72009
Topic revision: r4 - 2009-10-14 - DavidMeger
Copyright © 2008-2025 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki?
Send feedback