Line: 1 to 1 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Line: 11 to 11 | ||||||||
If you would like to get a new desk assignment please see Gregor. | ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | Current desk allocations can be seen at LabMachineListing. | |||||||
-- GregorKiczales - 27 Apr 2006 |
Line: 1 to 1 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | ||||||||
Desk allocation is maintained by Gregor. Centralizing this makes it possible to do future planning in a way that would not otherwise be possible. In doing desk allocation, we try to respect the following principles, in roughly this order: | ||||||||
Line: 12 to 11 | ||||||||
If you would like to get a new desk assignment please see Gregor. | ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | Current desk allocations can be seen at LabMachineListing. | |||||||
-- GregorKiczales - 27 Apr 2006 |
Line: 1 to 1 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Deleted: | ||||||||
< < | The following policy was agreed to for allocating the quads for the future. | |||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
> > | Desk allocation is maintained by Gregor. Centralizing this makes it possible to do future planning in a way that would not otherwise be possible. | |||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | FAQ | |||||||
> > | In doing desk allocation, we try to respect the following principles, in roughly this order: | |||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | Shouldn't PhD students have precedence? They're here for longer. | |||||||
> > |
| |||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | As other students graduate, PhD students will eventually percolate upwards by attrition. During the first year, they're likely taking classes and so it shouldn't matter as much anyways. | |||||||
> > | If you would like to get a new desk assignment please see Gregor. | |||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | Shouldn't we differentiate by whether the new occupants are doing research? The use of seniority essentially provides this. How long is a `short-term use'? Left deliberately vague for flexibility. Generally an office can be found for longer-term visitors. And extremely short-term visitors generally won't need much space anyways. When shouldn't I take a spot? It's expected that people will use some common sense in following this policy: if you're unlikely to be here for much longer, save yourself the hassle of packing and moving and give up your place. | |||||||
> > | -- GregorKiczales - 27 Apr 2006 | |||||||
Line: 1 to 1 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Line: 10 to 10 | ||||||||
Shouldn't PhD students have precedence? They're here for longer. | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | As other students graduate, PhD students will eventually percolate upwards by attrition. During the first year, they're likely taking classes and so it shouldn't matter as much anyways. | |||||||
> > | As other students graduate, PhD students will eventually percolate upwards by attrition. During the first year, they're likely taking classes and so it shouldn't matter as much anyways. | |||||||
Shouldn't we differentiate by whether the new occupants are doing research? |
Line: 1 to 1 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
FAQShouldn't PhD students have precedence? They're here for longer. As other students graduate, PhD students will eventually percolate upwards by attrition. During the first year, they're likely taking classes and so it shouldn't matter as much anyways. Shouldn't we differentiate by whether the new occupants are doing research? The use of seniority essentially provides this. How long is a `short-term use'? Left deliberately vague for flexibility. Generally an office can be found for longer-term visitors. And extremely short-term visitors generally won't need much space anyways. When shouldn't I take a spot? It's expected that people will use some common sense in following this policy: if you're unlikely to be here for much longer, save yourself the hassle of packing and moving and give up your place. |