Difference: DeskAllocationPolicy (1 vs. 5)

Revision 52006-05-19 - GregorKiczales

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
Desk allocation is maintained by Gregor. Centralizing this makes it possible to do future planning in a way that would not otherwise be possible.
Line: 11 to 11
  If you would like to get a new desk assignment please see Gregor.
Deleted:
<
<
Current desk allocations can be seen at LabMachineListing.
 -- GregorKiczales - 27 Apr 2006

Revision 42006-05-19 - BrettCannon

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
Deleted:
<
<
 Desk allocation is maintained by Gregor. Centralizing this makes it possible to do future planning in a way that would not otherwise be possible.

In doing desk allocation, we try to respect the following principles, in roughly this order:

Line: 12 to 11
  If you would like to get a new desk assignment please see Gregor.
Added:
>
>
Current desk allocations can be seen at LabMachineListing.
 -- GregorKiczales - 27 Apr 2006

Revision 32006-04-27 - GregorKiczales

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
Deleted:
<
<
The following policy was agreed to for allocating the quads for the future.
 
Changed:
<
<
  • When a desk comes open, it is allocated by seniority, as determined by the number of months since joining the SPL.
  • In the case of a tie, the winner is determined by a coin toss.
  • Faculty members can override this policy for short-term uses (e.g. lab visitors).
>
>
Desk allocation is maintained by Gregor. Centralizing this makes it possible to do future planning in a way that would not otherwise be possible.
 
Changed:
<
<

FAQ

>
>
In doing desk allocation, we try to respect the following principles, in roughly this order:
 
Changed:
<
<
Shouldn't PhD students have precedence? They're here for longer.
>
>
  • Tenure - better desks go to people who have been here the longest
  • Seniority - PhD students get better spots than MSc students etc.
  • Proximity - people who work very closely together may need to be near each other
  • Efficiency - avoid people having to move often, or move again shortly after a move
 
Changed:
<
<
As other students graduate, PhD students will eventually percolate upwards by attrition. During the first year, they're likely taking classes and so it shouldn't matter as much anyways.
>
>
If you would like to get a new desk assignment please see Gregor.
 
Changed:
<
<
Shouldn't we differentiate by whether the new occupants are doing research?

The use of seniority essentially provides this.

How long is a `short-term use'?

Left deliberately vague for flexibility. Generally an office can be found for longer-term visitors. And extremely short-term visitors generally won't need much space anyways.

When shouldn't I take a spot?

It's expected that people will use some common sense in following this policy: if you're unlikely to be here for much longer, save yourself the hassle of packing and moving and give up your place.

>
>
-- GregorKiczales - 27 Apr 2006
 

Revision 22005-12-08 - JohnAnvik

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
The following policy was agreed to for allocating the quads for the future.

Line: 10 to 10
  Shouldn't PhD students have precedence? They're here for longer.
Changed:
<
<
As other students graduate, PhD students will eventually percolate upwards by attrition. During the first year, they're likely taking classes and so it shouldn't matter as much anyways.
>
>
As other students graduate, PhD students will eventually percolate upwards by attrition. During the first year, they're likely taking classes and so it shouldn't matter as much anyways.
  Shouldn't we differentiate by whether the new occupants are doing research?

Revision 12005-12-08 - bsd

Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
The following policy was agreed to for allocating the quads for the future.

  • When a desk comes open, it is allocated by seniority, as determined by the number of months since joining the SPL.
  • In the case of a tie, the winner is determined by a coin toss.
  • Faculty members can override this policy for short-term uses (e.g. lab visitors).

FAQ

Shouldn't PhD students have precedence? They're here for longer.

As other students graduate, PhD students will eventually percolate upwards by attrition. During the first year, they're likely taking classes and so it shouldn't matter as much anyways.

Shouldn't we differentiate by whether the new occupants are doing research?

The use of seniority essentially provides this.

How long is a `short-term use'?

Left deliberately vague for flexibility. Generally an office can be found for longer-term visitors. And extremely short-term visitors generally won't need much space anyways.

When shouldn't I take a spot?

It's expected that people will use some common sense in following this policy: if you're unlikely to be here for much longer, save yourself the hassle of packing and moving and give up your place.

 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright © 2008-2025 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback