Schedule and Readings
(subject to changes)
Post questions on readings in Piazza
use specific folder, e.g. "sept9" for the questions due on Sept 9
Send your summaries to conati@cs.ubc.ca
September
5 | Introduction |
A. Jameson. "Adaptive Interfaces and Agents" in Human-Computer Interface Handbook, 2008
|
12 | slides | Discussion of
Jameson's paper 2 questions: by 12noon on Monday Sept 9 No summary (post in folder "sept9" in Piazza)
|
Mixed-Initiative Interaction |
E. Horvitz. Principles of Mixed-Initiative User Interfaces. CHI '99, 159166 2 questions: by 12noon on Monday Sept 9 No summary (post in folder "sept9" in Piazza)
Bunt A., Conati C. and McGrenere J. (2007). Supporting Interface Customization Using a Mixed-Initiative Approach. IUI 2007, International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 92-101. 2 questions: by 9pm, Wed Sept 11 Summary
2 questions: by 9pm, Wed Sept 11 No summary (post in folder "sept11" in Piazza) |
|
18 | No class | |
26 | Taking Over Routine tasks/Provision of Help | Discussion of Bunt et
al (2007), and Radar paper from previous class
Make sure to review the
papers and come ready to ask your questions
|
October
3 | Adapting the Interface |
Gotz et al.
Adaptive
Contextualization: Combating Bias During High-Dimensional
Visualization and Data Selection.
IUI 2016:
p. 85-95
Gajos, K. et al (2006) . Exploring the design space for adaptive graphical user interfaces. In Proceedings of AVI ’06, Advanced Visual Interfaces (Alireza)
|
Liu et al (2017)
BIGnav: Bayesian Information Gain for Guiding
Multiscale Navigation
(link) , CHI 2017, p. 5869-5880
|
||
10 | Support to Human Learning |
Corbett, A. et al. (2000) Modeling Student Knowledge: Cognitive Tutors in High School and College. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 10(2-3): 81-108 [Presenter: Katerina] (mandatory sections 1, 2, 4.5 and 6)
Mitrovic T. 2010. Modeling Domains and Students with Constraint-based Modeling. In Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Springer p. 63-80. (can skip sections 4.4.3, 4.4.4, 4.5, 4.6.2, 4.6.3) [Presenter: Patrick]
Kodaganallur, V., Weitz, R. R. and
Rosenthal, D. (2005). A Comparison of
Model-Tracing and Constraint-Based Intelligent Tutoring Paradigms.
International Journal of AI in Education 15, 117-144.
2
questions, no summary
|
17 | Project Proposals | Each proposal should
be presented with slides that describe - the problem (strongly recommended to use a running example to clarify), - brief summary of relevant related work - tentative proposed solution(s), - envisioned challenges - tentative workplan and timeline One of the purposes of this presentation is to get feedback from the class, so feel free to mention specific points on which you may want this feedback. Plan for about 10' of presentation. The 3-page proposal mentioned in the syllabus (containing the same info as above) will not be due until Friday end of the day |
Support to Human Learning | Merten and Conati
(2006). Eye-Tracking to Model and
Adapt to User Meta-cognition in Intelligent Learning Environments.
Proceedings of IUI 06, International
Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 8 pages 2 questions, one summary by Wed 9pm (use Oct 16 folder). Cannot use bonus for this paper |
|
24 | Support To Human Learning/Adapting to Affect | Conati C. (2011)
Combining cognitive appraisal and sensors for affect detection in a
framework for modeling user affect
New perspectives on affect and learning
technologies, 71-84
2
questions, by Monday 3pm (use Oct 21 folder). NO summaryPaquette et al (2015) Sensor-Free or Sensor-Full: A Comparison of Data Modalities in Multi-Channel Affect Detection. EDM 2015: 93-100 (Katerina) 2 questions, one summary by Monday 3pm (use Oct 21 folder). Pielot, et al (2015) When attention is not scarce-detecting boredom from mobile phone usage. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, ACM(2015), 825–836 (Patrick) 2 questions, one summary by Wed 9pm (use Oct 28 folder).
|
31 | Support to Info Acquisition/Decision Making |
2 questions, one summary by Monday 3pm (use Oct 28 folder).
2 questions, one summary by Wed 9pm (use Oct 30 folder). |
November
7 | Support to Info Acquisition/Decision Making |
Incorporating Emotion Perception into Opponent Modeling for Social Dilemmas. AAMAS 2017: 801-809 (Samuel) Two questions, one summary by Monday 3pm (use Nov 4 folder). Good,N.,et al .,Combining Collaborative Filtering with Personal Agents for Better Recommendations. Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of the American Association of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-99). pp 439-446 (Alireza) Two questions, NO summary by Monday 3pm (use Nov 4 folder).
Two questions, one summary by Wed 9pm (use Nov 6 folder). |
14 | Explainability and Trust |
Wang,
et al The Impact of POMDP-Generated Explanations on Trust and Performance in Human-Robot Teams. AAMAS 2016: 997-1005 (Siyan) 2 questions by Tuesday 12pm (use Nov 15 folder) Abdul et al. Trends and Trajectories for Explainable, Accountable and Intelligible Systems: An HCI Research Agenda. CHI 2018: (10 pages of text) 2 questions by Wed 9pm (Use Nov 15 folder)
|
Project Update | ||
21 | Explainability and Trust | Millecamp et al.
To explain or not to explain: the effects of personal characteristics when explaining music recommendations. IUI 2019: 397-407 (Katerina) Two questions, one summary by Monday 3pm (use Nov 18 folder).
Two questions, by Monday 3pm (use Nov 18 folder). |
Socially Intelligent Agents |
Irony Man: Augmenting a Social Robot with the Ability to Use Irony in Multimodal Communication with Humans. AAMAS 2019: 86-94 (Patrick)
|
|
28 | Socially Intelligent Agents |
Romero et al (2017)
Cognitive-Inspired Conversational-Strategy Reasoner for Socially-Aware
Agents. IJCAI 2017, 3807-3813
(Alireza) Two questions, one summary by Monday 3pm (use Nov 25 folder). |
Final Project Presentation | No more than 10' each. I will cut off after 10'. There is no need to provide a detailed summary of the project, you only need a one-slide reminder of the general objective/research questions. Focus on your results, on how they match the original objective/research questions, and discuss limitations. |